“Informative” “journalism” whose purpose is to “educate” the “public.” Get it? “Confirmed” “facts” jk LOL.
I probably watched more cable news this week than I have in 5 years (other than during elections), which is to say that I watched SOME cable news this week instead of NONE. EVER. NEVER EVER. I found myself listening to the 1 or 2 pieces of information the head-talkers possessed then muting the TV before they could repeat, rephrase, reiterate and rehash the same information continuously for the next 30 minutes until something else happened. I just want an informed person who is adept at communication to tell me what’s going on, then stop talking. Maybe cut to a slideshow of relevant images, maps, etc. when the facts run out. Don’t cut to “a guy” who “used to know a guy” to talk about “his feelings” or “some stuff” just because there is airtime to fill. “Well, that’s all the news we have for now. Joining us via satellite is some guy who was near the explosion. How did the explosion make you feel, guy?” / “Pretty exploded, Dan.” And the nation rests easy knowing how extremely informed it is.
It was odd that during this last week of unimaginable simultaneous national crises I got the most relevant, concise and up to date information from Twitter. I’m not saying this is how it SHOULD be. I’m just saying this is how is WAS this particular time. It’s a bit of a shock to realize that we are now able to read and often watch first hand accounts of major world events exactly as they are happening from the people they are happening too. CNN doesn’t have a camera in the house of a guy on the street where the terrorists are thought to be hiding, but that guy has a smartphone which makes him a defacto imbedded reporter.
I feel like we aren’t that far from a time when a major event happens and some sort of rudimentary AI starts to comb the web for first hand accounts, tweets, blog posts, YouTube videos, etc., then aggregates, edits and presents them to you as “Here’s what’s happening right now.” It would basically be an on demand, custom new broadcast created in real time based on the real information that was available. Sort of like the city wide cell phone imaging system from The Dark Knight but with Tweets and Vines (and maybe a few Yelp reviews). Of course the moment something like this existed would be the moment people started gaming the system. Tweeting false information to sway public opinion, etc. Wait… we already do that. Never mind.
COMMENTERS: How do you like to get your news? From a professional news-talker on the TV box or a “professional” news-newser from the Internet box? Or perhaps you get it from that fist guy’s grandpa who works at a newspaper that hasn’t closed yet for some reason. Or do you take to the social web and cull through the 1000’s of cat photos and food tweets to find the real first hand accounts?
Alexander Burns· 110 weeks ago
@autojim · 110 weeks ago
The first time I really did this was 1995, the Murrah Building in OKC. The internet wasn’t nearly what it was then (I hadn’t yet switched over to a proper ‘net dialup account, still being on GEnie, which had the Lynx text-only browser and generally sucked), but I had an uncle who was in that building (he was okay aside from a coating of dust and about 7 minutes missing from his personal timeline. Postal workrooms in Federal buildings are hardened to keep booms in, which also helps keep booms out) and his brother, a now-retired FBI agent, was one of the first feds on the scene – and one of the guys who escorted McVeigh off the chopper at Tinker AFB after he was flown back from Perry, so there was a personal interest there. (As it turns out, one of my HS classmates was one of the 168 victims — she was in the SS office tending to some paperwork issue or other and had a good chunk of the building land on her.)
So yeah, I’m a news junkie up to the point where the bullshit starts getting thick. Then I stop.
@ScribbleDragon · 110 weeks ago
Morlock · 110 weeks ago
http://www.theonion.com/articles/jesus-this-week,…
thelogos · 110 weeks ago
TheOldTook· 110 weeks ago
Mr C · 110 weeks ago
Wesley · 110 weeks ago
4 replies · active 110 weeks ago
hijinksensue· 110 weeks ago
Zee · 110 weeks ago
I wanted to “terrorize” whomever wrote it.
lou · 110 weeks ago
@Mechamaniac · 110 weeks ago
@borednihilist · 110 weeks ago
Nephaline · 110 weeks ago
Prefer to live in my bubble and avoid the negative stuff.
Bill Murphy · 110 weeks ago
Cheers to next week! sluuurp…
deadrobot · 110 weeks ago
voxboxcomics· 110 weeks ago
Liam · 110 weeks ago
Josh · 110 weeks ago
bubujin_2 · 110 weeks ago
Siirenias · 110 weeks ago
@ZacMcCaffrey · 110 weeks ago