<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mixing Metaphors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hijinksensue.com/2009/05/04/mixing-metaphors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hijinksensue.com/2009/05/04/mixing-metaphors/</link>
	<description>geek comic, geek webcomic, geek culture comic</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:40:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hijinksensu5337</title>
		<link>http://hijinksensue.com/2009/05/04/mixing-metaphors/comment-page-1/#comment-19017</link>
		<dc:creator>hijinksensu5337</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hijinksensue.com/?p=1022#comment-19017</guid>
		<description>I know a guy who&#039;s couch he slept on (seriously). same guy who&#039;s house they filmed Dr. Horrible in. HE is NPH&#039;s BFF.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know a guy who&#039;s couch he slept on (seriously). same guy who&#039;s house they filmed Dr. Horrible in. HE is NPH&#039;s BFF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amity</title>
		<link>http://hijinksensue.com/2009/05/04/mixing-metaphors/comment-page-1/#comment-18945</link>
		<dc:creator>Amity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hijinksensue.com/?p=1022#comment-18945</guid>
		<description>Neil Patrick Harris went to High School in my hometown.  I can very much relate to the &quot;BFF&quot; feeling :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil Patrick Harris went to High School in my hometown.  I can very much relate to the &quot;BFF&quot; feeling <img src='http://hijinksensue.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonah C</title>
		<link>http://hijinksensue.com/2009/05/04/mixing-metaphors/comment-page-1/#comment-18428</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonah C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 08:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hijinksensue.com/?p=1022#comment-18428</guid>
		<description>You are so right about how you make Star Trek jokes without even realizing it, and I love it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are so right about how you make Star Trek jokes without even realizing it, and I love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bailey</title>
		<link>http://hijinksensue.com/2009/05/04/mixing-metaphors/comment-page-1/#comment-18235</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 13:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hijinksensue.com/?p=1022#comment-18235</guid>
		<description>Oh, I didn&#039;t know that was Tudyk, I thought that it was Michael Arrington from TechCrunch.com &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.geckoandfly.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/michael_arrington_techcrunch.jpg&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.geckoandfly.com/wp-content/uploads/200...&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I didn&#039;t know that was Tudyk, I thought that it was Michael Arrington from TechCrunch.com <a href="http://www.geckoandfly.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/michael_arrington_techcrunch.jpg" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.geckoandfly.com/wp-content/uploads/200.." rel="nofollow">http://www.geckoandfly.com/wp-content/uploads/200..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free for All Friday 20 : Sarah Et Cetera</title>
		<link>http://hijinksensue.com/2009/05/04/mixing-metaphors/comment-page-1/#comment-18165</link>
		<dc:creator>Free for All Friday 20 : Sarah Et Cetera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 14:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hijinksensue.com/?p=1022#comment-18165</guid>
		<description>[...] the always scintillating Zooey Glass: Alan Tudyk is Human Bacon Bits. This really gets at some universal truths, y&#8217;all. Alan Tudyk is perfect, but with the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the always scintillating Zooey Glass: Alan Tudyk is Human Bacon Bits. This really gets at some universal truths, y&#8217;all. Alan Tudyk is perfect, but with the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara</title>
		<link>http://hijinksensue.com/2009/05/04/mixing-metaphors/comment-page-1/#comment-18137</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 22:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hijinksensue.com/?p=1022#comment-18137</guid>
		<description>Alan was just awesome in this episode. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan was just awesome in this episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shakey</title>
		<link>http://hijinksensue.com/2009/05/04/mixing-metaphors/comment-page-1/#comment-18116</link>
		<dc:creator>Shakey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 09:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hijinksensue.com/?p=1022#comment-18116</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t understand where people get the anti-woman vibe from. Other than a throwaway shot of Echo returning from a Dominatrix assignment (and therefore she&#039;s fully in control) , I don&#039;t recall seeing any of our heroines being sent out on sexually abusive assignments. Yes, episode 1 had Echo involved in a three-day companionship assignment that ultimately involved sex, but it was hardly any different than any &quot;normal&quot; person losing themselves to a whirlwind romance - remember that before she was wiped she had fallen for him and had every intention of returning to him. 
 
Compare that to Victor and his repeated Lonely Hearts assignments - if there&#039;s any direct prostitution going on we&#039;ve only seen it with a male Doll. 
 
&quot;Offered up for physical abuse&quot;? Since when? The actions in episode 2 came about because of a failing in the Dollhouse - that was the entire point of the episode. Any other time we&#039;ve seen physicality involving a Doll it&#039;s usually been part of the deal and therefore they&#039;ve been programmed to deal with it. 
 
At the end of the day, if you&#039;re getting bad vibes from the Dollhouse&#039;s operations then that&#039;s the entire point - they&#039;re not doing all this for fluffy reasons. 
 
I can fully understand your opinions being based on disappointment for the show and as a result you&#039;re perhaps not paying as much attention, but if your comments are indicative of your full opinion I fear you&#039;ve missed many, many things. 
 
Yes, OK, the big twist in episodes 6 was yet-another faceless global mega-corp conspiracy, but so what? JJ Abrams seems to make a living rehashing that same premise with every new show, but nobody seems to complain (and rightly so - Fringe is fantastic). 
 
I&#039;m not saying that FOX is entirely to blame for Dollhouse&#039;s woes. As I said, I felt episodes 7 and 8 were weak (certainly 7 stopped me caring about the main damn character) which comes from when, apparently, Joss took the reigns back from FOX - which isn&#039;t a good thing, but when it&#039;s good it&#039;s very good and the simple fact is FOX has never given Dollhouse proper support to allow it to find its feet. OK, they did have faith in letting him build that huge set and commissioned the show without a pilot, but did that faith translate into marketing, public awareness and a half-decent timeslot? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#039;t understand where people get the anti-woman vibe from. Other than a throwaway shot of Echo returning from a Dominatrix assignment (and therefore she&#039;s fully in control) , I don&#039;t recall seeing any of our heroines being sent out on sexually abusive assignments. Yes, episode 1 had Echo involved in a three-day companionship assignment that ultimately involved sex, but it was hardly any different than any &quot;normal&quot; person losing themselves to a whirlwind romance &#8211; remember that before she was wiped she had fallen for him and had every intention of returning to him. </p>
<p>Compare that to Victor and his repeated Lonely Hearts assignments &#8211; if there&#039;s any direct prostitution going on we&#039;ve only seen it with a male Doll. </p>
<p>&quot;Offered up for physical abuse&quot;? Since when? The actions in episode 2 came about because of a failing in the Dollhouse &#8211; that was the entire point of the episode. Any other time we&#039;ve seen physicality involving a Doll it&#039;s usually been part of the deal and therefore they&#039;ve been programmed to deal with it. </p>
<p>At the end of the day, if you&#039;re getting bad vibes from the Dollhouse&#039;s operations then that&#039;s the entire point &#8211; they&#039;re not doing all this for fluffy reasons. </p>
<p>I can fully understand your opinions being based on disappointment for the show and as a result you&#039;re perhaps not paying as much attention, but if your comments are indicative of your full opinion I fear you&#039;ve missed many, many things. </p>
<p>Yes, OK, the big twist in episodes 6 was yet-another faceless global mega-corp conspiracy, but so what? JJ Abrams seems to make a living rehashing that same premise with every new show, but nobody seems to complain (and rightly so &#8211; Fringe is fantastic). </p>
<p>I&#039;m not saying that FOX is entirely to blame for Dollhouse&#039;s woes. As I said, I felt episodes 7 and 8 were weak (certainly 7 stopped me caring about the main damn character) which comes from when, apparently, Joss took the reigns back from FOX &#8211; which isn&#039;t a good thing, but when it&#039;s good it&#039;s very good and the simple fact is FOX has never given Dollhouse proper support to allow it to find its feet. OK, they did have faith in letting him build that huge set and commissioned the show without a pilot, but did that faith translate into marketing, public awareness and a half-decent timeslot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://hijinksensue.com/2009/05/04/mixing-metaphors/comment-page-1/#comment-18114</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 02:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hijinksensue.com/?p=1022#comment-18114</guid>
		<description>He truly is a leaf on the wind </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He truly is a leaf on the wind</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shakey</title>
		<link>http://hijinksensue.com/2009/05/04/mixing-metaphors/comment-page-1/#comment-18113</link>
		<dc:creator>Shakey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hijinksensue.com/?p=1022#comment-18113</guid>
		<description>IMO no. 
 
Episode 6 was sensational, 9 made the entire show and its direction very clear, 10 opened up big cans of technological and ethical worms and 11 kicked in that last piece of the puzzle. 
 
If anything&#039;s really killed it for me it was getting some backstory on Caroline in episode 7 - getting an idea of who she was put me off her so much I no longer care about Caroline and don&#039;t want Echo to be undone. By extension I want Ballard&#039;s motivations to be bringing down the Dollhouse its own reason, not to save Caroline. 
 
But there is enough going on with Ballard&#039;s inside &quot;man&quot;, the increasingly human Adelle de Witt, the organisation as a whole and Alpha&#039;s motivations and backstory to keep me interested even if Caroline has pissed me off. 
 
The show was never fully about her anyway. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO no. </p>
<p>Episode 6 was sensational, 9 made the entire show and its direction very clear, 10 opened up big cans of technological and ethical worms and 11 kicked in that last piece of the puzzle. </p>
<p>If anything&#039;s really killed it for me it was getting some backstory on Caroline in episode 7 &#8211; getting an idea of who she was put me off her so much I no longer care about Caroline and don&#039;t want Echo to be undone. By extension I want Ballard&#039;s motivations to be bringing down the Dollhouse its own reason, not to save Caroline. </p>
<p>But there is enough going on with Ballard&#039;s inside &quot;man&quot;, the increasingly human Adelle de Witt, the organisation as a whole and Alpha&#039;s motivations and backstory to keep me interested even if Caroline has pissed me off. </p>
<p>The show was never fully about her anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Bosch</title>
		<link>http://hijinksensue.com/2009/05/04/mixing-metaphors/comment-page-1/#comment-18112</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Bosch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 20:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hijinksensue.com/?p=1022#comment-18112</guid>
		<description>This time, I don&#039;t think we can&#039;t blame Fox for the failure of Dollhouse.  The show had a fatally-flawed premise, too many badly-written episodes with obvious plot developments, and a vacant hole where you should have had a lead actress with an emotional centre.  Failing that, Ballard should have been our moral centre, but comes across as a Major Jerk.  
 
Top it off with unlikeable characters and a icky, anti-woman vibe, (our heroines are basically being offered up for sexual and / or physical abuse with each assignment), and it&#039;s easy to turn it off.  Especially after the much-hyped sixth episode basically turned out to expect us to be wowed by a Bog-Standard International Evil Corporation Conspiracy, (are there any benevolent ones in Sci-Fi?), and the yawn-worthy revelation of a character as a Doll, whose only reason to be in the show from her first appearance was to be later revealed as a Doll. 
 
Fox didn&#039;t create the premise and characters and  suggest the episode plots. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This time, I don&#039;t think we can&#039;t blame Fox for the failure of Dollhouse.  The show had a fatally-flawed premise, too many badly-written episodes with obvious plot developments, and a vacant hole where you should have had a lead actress with an emotional centre.  Failing that, Ballard should have been our moral centre, but comes across as a Major Jerk.  </p>
<p>Top it off with unlikeable characters and a icky, anti-woman vibe, (our heroines are basically being offered up for sexual and / or physical abuse with each assignment), and it&#039;s easy to turn it off.  Especially after the much-hyped sixth episode basically turned out to expect us to be wowed by a Bog-Standard International Evil Corporation Conspiracy, (are there any benevolent ones in Sci-Fi?), and the yawn-worthy revelation of a character as a Doll, whose only reason to be in the show from her first appearance was to be later revealed as a Doll. </p>
<p>Fox didn&#039;t create the premise and characters and  suggest the episode plots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
